 Favorites |
 Google |
 Digg |
 Del.icio.us |
 Twitter |
 Facebook |
>> More...
Guidance on Evaluation Reports to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
A Checklist for Evaluators
Published: October 2009
Get full text or downloads
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) is a long-time proponent of evaluation as a means to inquire systematically into the effects and impacts of its grantmaking programs. Evaluation reports to RWJF should generally include the elements listed in this checklist to be considered satisfactory. The checklist was adapted from several references listed at the bottom of the document.
RWJF recognizes that not all of these elements pertain to all types of evaluation—for example, response rate may not be an issue for certain qualitative studies and attrition may not matter for cross-sectional studies. The report, however, ought to address most elements under most circumstances.
Share:
There are currently no additional readings for this publication.
Evaluations
As defined by the American Evaluation Association, evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products and organizations to improve their effectiveness. RWJF evaluates programs, major initiatives, policies and, at times, products.
Evaluation tools
Helpful guides detailing the RWJF approach to project or program evaluations.