In 1995–1997, David Blumenthal, MD, PhD, and researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, evaluated the impact of a major component of managed care—the use of a primary care physician as a gatekeeper to authorize all health services of HMO members.
Researchers collected health care claims data from the two years before and the two years after patients switched from a traditional indemnity plan without gatekeepers to an HMO. Researchers also conducted self-administered surveys of both patients and physicians.
This project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) national program Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO).
Key Findings: Researchers reported the following findings in a Findings Brief available at the HCFO website.
- Primarily as a result of reduced use of specialists, gatekeeping resulted in lower costs during the first year. However, costs rose during the second year as patients became familiar with administrative requirements for obtaining specialist care. Second year costs were just below indemnity plan levels.
- The gatekeeping requirement appeared to improve continuity of care through the advice and oversight of specialty care provided by the primary care physician.
- HMO enrollees were less positive than indemnity plan subscribers about:
- Information provided by their primary care physician.
- The thoroughness of physical examinations.
- Their physician's personal interest, attention and amount of time with them.
- Although physicians were positive about cost control in the gatekeeping system, they felt that gatekeeping did not yield as much quality of care and satisfaction as the traditional indemnity plan did.
- Gatekeeping did not result in a significant increase in preventive health care measures such as number of Pap tests, mammograms and other screening procedures.
Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, Changes in Health Care Financing and OrganizationRead the Program Results for Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization
- About this grant
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.
When companies invest in employee wellness, it’s good for health, productivity ... and the bottom line.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
As smartphone technology becomes ever more ubiquitous and the dangers of tobacco become ever more apparent, it’s not surprising that there a...
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
NewPublicHealth spoke with the Julio Frenk, MD, MPH, PHD, Dean of the Harvard School of Public Health, about how public health has changed o...
MTV executives are attempting to mollify nurses and nursing allies who are outraged over a salacious new “reality” television show about a g...