From 1999 to 2003, the Washington-based Partnership for Caring (formerly Choice in Dying) explored how healthcare agents-and the individuals who appoint them-view the role and responsibilities of healthcare agents in making end-of-life treatment decisions.
The project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) national program Targeted End-of-Life Projects Initiative.
The Study: The researchers recruited participants for the two-part study from two Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers. In the first part of the study, researchers interviewed 53 subjects—26 principals, 18 agents who were appointed but not serving as healthcare decision-makers, and nine healthcare agents who were serving as decision-makers.
In the second part of the study, 23 healthcare agents of VA patients who had died within the previous nine months participated in four focus groups. Partnership for Caring subcontracted with the research firm Lake Snell Perry & Associates, Washington, to conduct the focus groups.
- Knowledge about the roles of healthcare agents and the process of decision-making was generally poor, and helpful information was often hard to come by.
- The study results identified a number of communication barriers, with some agents feeling that they were not valued as partners in the decision-making process and had to fight to get health care providers to respect their roles and decisions.
- Many of the agents who participated in the study also were caregivers. Many of these individuals did not make a distinction between agent and caregiver roles or did not find the distinction meaningful.
- The literature contains a number of studies considering the issue of a principal's shifting capacity and the problems this creates in preparing and implementing advance directives.
- Project results suggest that healthcare providers need to develop systems to enable agents to be more consistently involved in the care of principals, so that they receive information that is relevant to the patients' care on an on-going basis.
Targeted End-of-Life Projects Initiative Projects - Strategy 3
Individual project results from the RWJF Targeted End-of-Life Projects Initiative, strategy 3: To engage the public and professionals in efforts to improve end-of-life care.Read the Program Results for Targeted End-of-Life Projects Initiative
- About this grant
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
MTV executives are attempting to mollify nurses and nursing allies who are outraged over a salacious new “reality” television show about a g...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
Judith Halstead, president of the National League for Nursing, writes about the role of nursing education in realizing a transformed health ...
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.