Researchers at Yale University examined the financial impact on children and their families of state laws mandating that insurers provide parity in coverage for mental and physical illness.
The researchers studied families with children who required mental health care. They compared out-of-pocket spending and other measures of financial burden among families living in states that have laws mandating parity in mental health coverage with those of families living in states without such mandates.
This project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) national program Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO). HCFO supports policy analysis, research, evaluation and demonstration projects designed to provide public and private decision leaders with usable and timely information on health care policy and financing issues.
- The researchers estimated that in states with parity laws, 21 percent of families spend more than $1,000 out-of-pocket on health care for their child, compared with 28 percent of families in states without such laws.
- Families in states with parity laws were less likely to report that their child's health care caused financial problems than were families in states without such laws (25% in parity states versus 35% in non-parity states).
- Family members of children needing mental health care were significantly more likely to cut their work hours to care for a child and to stop working because of a child's health than were parents of children with other special health care needs.
- Findings from this study indicate that parity laws are beneficial to children in need of mental health care. Policies aimed at eliminating the restrictions on mental health care under private insurance policies could be helpful in lowering the financial burden of caring for a mentally ill child.
Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, Changes in Health Care Financing and OrganizationRead the Program Results for Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization
- About this grant
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
MTV executives are attempting to mollify nurses and nursing allies who are outraged over a salacious new “reality” television show about a g...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.