In 2007, the Center for Science in the Public Interest hosted a conference of child and nutrition advocates to discuss the state of food marketing to children, and to strategize how to reduce children's exposure to the marketing of low-nutrition foods.
The conference built on a 2005 report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), entitled Food Marketing to Children: Threat or Opportunity?, which concluded that existing food and beverage marketing practices put children's long-term health at risk. The report also offered recommendations on ways in which various sectors could help improve the diets and health of children and youth.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest, based in Washington, is a nonprofit education and advocacy organization that works to improve the safety and nutritional quality of the nation's food supply, and to reduce the damage caused by alcoholic beverages.
Key Results: The conference, entitled "Food Marketing to Children: Problems, Policies and Priorities," took place on April 17, 2007, in Washington. It brought together over 60 child and nutrition advocates from local, state and national organizations to:
- Review the evidence regarding the impact of food marketing on children's diets and health.
- Review the history of initiatives to stem junk food marketing to children.
- Discuss the recommendations of the recent IOM food marketing report.
- Build consensus for an advocacy strategy.
According to the project director, one of the chief accomplishments of the conference was the development of a national action plan to limit the marketing of unhealthy food to children. The plan includes the following strategies:
- Engage key organizations and expand the number of organizations working on the issue of food marketing to children.
- Limit the marketing and sale of low-nutrition foods and beverages in schools.
- Track and publicize industry actions regarding the marketing of foods to children (both positive and negative), and encourage companies to do better.
- Explore ways to limit marketing to children through the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
- Encourage the IOM to set nutrition standards for food marketing to children and, over the long term, to build support for reestablishing the FCC's authority to regulate food and beverage marketing to children.
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
CDC: Measles Remains a Threat to U.S. Health Security - HHS: $55.5M to Strengthen Training of U.S. Health Professionals, Especially in Nursi...
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.
Janet Tomiyama was recently named the 2013 recipient of the Early Career Investigator Award from the Society of Behavioral Medicine.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
A conference in St. Paul, Minnesota earlier this month examined ideas and emerging examples for building a healthier Minnesota by promoting ...
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.