In this paper, Harold D. Miller of the RWJF-commissioned Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform takes an in-depth look at practical ways to successfully manage the multifaceted implementation challenges inherent with payment reform initiatives, using lessons learned from previous efforts.
From the Report
There is widespread agreement that current methods of paying for health care contribute to both high costs and poor quality. Not only do they create strong incentives to increase the volume of services delivered, current payment methods often create barriers to delivering higher quality and more efficient care and can even penalize health care providers for keeping people healthy, reducing errors and complications, and avoiding unnecessary services.
To date the only broadly implemented changes in payment systems to try and address these issues have been pay-for-performance (P4P) programs. Although P4P programs have encouraged some improvements in quality, most involve relatively small amounts of funding and focus on relatively few care processes. Most importantly, they do not correct the problems in the underlying payment systems, falling short of the reform needed to deliver true change.
Two fundamental types of reforms in payment systems are needed:
Episode-of-Care Payment, i.e., paying a single amount to cover all of the services which are provided to a patient during a single episode of care (e.g., the treatment of a heart attack), rather than making separate payments to hospitals, physicians, and other providers and rather than paying more for services needed to address preventable complications. Episode of Care Payment gives the involved providers an incentive to coordinate their activities, eliminate unnecessary services, and avoid preventable complications.
Comprehensive Care Payment (often called “global payment”), i.e., paying a single amount to cover all of the services needed to manage a patient’s conditions during a fixed period of time, regardless of how many separate episodes of care occur. This gives the providers involved in the patient’s care the flexibility to try innovative approaches and tailor services based on the patient’s needs, and it gives
them an incentive to avoid hospitalizations and unnecessary or overly-expensive services.
Although there is now growing recognition that these kinds of payment reforms are necessary if significant improvements in health care quality and costs are to be achieved, the challenge has become convincing health care providers, payers, purchasers, and consumers that they are feasible and helping them overcome the significant hurdles to implementation. The changes are inherently complex and risky, and the payers, providers, and communities that are interested in pursuing them face many practical challenges in doing so.
- 1 Aligning Forces for Quality: At the Forefront of Reform
- 2 Aligning Forces for Quality Report
- 3 How Registries Can Help Performance Measurement Improve Care
- 4 The ABCs of Measurement
- 5 Provisions Related to Quality in the New Health Reform Law
- 6 The State of Health Care Quality 2009
- 7 An Overview of Final Regulations Implementing HITECH's Meaningful Use Provisions and Their Implications for Regional Collaboratives
- 8 Making Reform a Reality
- 9 Quality & Equality in U.S. Health Care
- 10 How to Display Comparative Information that People Can Understand and Use
- 11 How to Describe the Health and Community Context for Comparative Performance Reports
- 12 Sample Site for Reporting Health Care Quality Data
- 13 Consumer Decision Points in Accessing Comparative Health Care Information
- 14 Improving Care Coordination by Streamlining Patient Referrals
- 15 Modifying the Admission Process to Improve the Collection and Accuracy of REL Data Collection
- 16 Modifying the Registration System to Accurately and Efficiently Capture Patient Language Preference
- 17 Ensuring REL Data Collection with the Use of a Post-Discharge Survey Tool
- 18 Ensuring Interpreter Qualifications and Standards Through Vendor Contracts
- 19 Educating and Motivating the Community to Reduce Disparities
Join the Commission on June 19, 2013 for a public meeting to raise awareness of how non-medical factors influence health and move public- an...
Mildred Dalton Manning, the last surviving member of a group of U.S. Army and Navy nurses taken prisoner in the Philippines at the start of ...
Learn how to improve care transitions and prevent avoidable hospital readmissions, and pick up nursing and medical education con-ed credits.
The RWJF Roadmaps to Health Prize honors outstanding community partnerships which are helping people live healthier lives. The six winners w...
This is the agenda for the June 19, 2013 RWJF Commission to Build a Healthier America public meeting.
The reconvened Commission to Build a Healthier America will provide new guidance in two key areas: early childhood and healthy communities.
Community college students in New Mexico will be able to remain in their home communities and complete BSNs through the collaborative effort...
The strange pull of this series is its humanity, not its horrors.
Pioneer Program Officer Lori Melichar discusses using social network insights to solve perplexing health and health care problems.
The full list of commissioners for the re-convened Commission to Build a Healthier America, led by Mark McClellan and Alice Rivlin.
A study finds that 96 percent of nurse practitioners and 76 percent of physicians agreed with IOM report recommendation that “nurse practiti...
Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas examines the ways that the gambling industry has designed gambling machines that encourag...