In this paper, Harold D. Miller of the RWJF-commissioned Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform takes an in-depth look at practical ways to successfully manage the multifaceted implementation challenges inherent with payment reform initiatives, using lessons learned from previous efforts.
From the Report
There is widespread agreement that current methods of paying for health care contribute to both high costs and poor quality. Not only do they create strong incentives to increase the volume of services delivered, current payment methods often create barriers to delivering higher quality and more efficient care and can even penalize health care providers for keeping people healthy, reducing errors and complications, and avoiding unnecessary services.
To date the only broadly implemented changes in payment systems to try and address these issues have been pay-for-performance (P4P) programs. Although P4P programs have encouraged some improvements in quality, most involve relatively small amounts of funding and focus on relatively few care processes. Most importantly, they do not correct the problems in the underlying payment systems, falling short of the reform needed to deliver true change.
Two fundamental types of reforms in payment systems are needed:
Episode-of-Care Payment, i.e., paying a single amount to cover all of the services which are provided to a patient during a single episode of care (e.g., the treatment of a heart attack), rather than making separate payments to hospitals, physicians, and other providers and rather than paying more for services needed to address preventable complications. Episode of Care Payment gives the involved providers an incentive to coordinate their activities, eliminate unnecessary services, and avoid preventable complications.
Comprehensive Care Payment (often called “global payment”), i.e., paying a single amount to cover all of the services needed to manage a patient’s conditions during a fixed period of time, regardless of how many separate episodes of care occur. This gives the providers involved in the patient’s care the flexibility to try innovative approaches and tailor services based on the patient’s needs, and it gives
them an incentive to avoid hospitalizations and unnecessary or overly-expensive services.
Although there is now growing recognition that these kinds of payment reforms are necessary if significant improvements in health care quality and costs are to be achieved, the challenge has become convincing health care providers, payers, purchasers, and consumers that they are feasible and helping them overcome the significant hurdles to implementation. The changes are inherently complex and risky, and the payers, providers, and communities that are interested in pursuing them face many practical challenges in doing so.
- 1 Aligning Forces for Quality: At the Forefront of Reform
- 2 Aligning Forces for Quality Report
- 3 How Registries Can Help Performance Measurement Improve Care
- 4 The ABCs of Measurement
- 5 Provisions Related to Quality in the New Health Reform Law
- 6 The State of Health Care Quality 2009
- 7 An Overview of Final Regulations Implementing HITECH's Meaningful Use Provisions and Their Implications for Regional Collaboratives
- 8 Making Reform a Reality
- 9 Quality & Equality in U.S. Health Care
- 10 How to Display Comparative Information that People Can Understand and Use
- 11 How to Describe the Health and Community Context for Comparative Performance Reports
- 12 Sample Site for Reporting Health Care Quality Data
- 13 Consumer Decision Points in Accessing Comparative Health Care Information
- 14 Improving Care Coordination by Streamlining Patient Referrals
- 15 Modifying the Admission Process to Improve the Collection and Accuracy of REL Data Collection
- 16 Modifying the Registration System to Accurately and Efficiently Capture Patient Language Preference
- 17 Ensuring REL Data Collection with the Use of a Post-Discharge Survey Tool
- 18 Ensuring Interpreter Qualifications and Standards Through Vendor Contracts
- 19 Educating and Motivating the Community to Reduce Disparities
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
Hear from social scientist BJ Fogg, RWJF’s Entrepreneur-in-Residence Thomas Goetz, a team with a vision for creating a social epidemic of sa...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
NewPublicHealth spoke with Danny McGoldrick, vice president of research at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, about “A Broken Promise to Ou...
Imagine a shared national culture of health in which being healthy and staying healthy are esteemed social values.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
NewPublicHealth spoke with John Auerbach, professor at Northeastern University and the primary author of a report on the Trust, and Cheryl B...
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
2013 America’s Health Rankings Finds Significant Progress in National Health - FDA to Phase Out Use of Certain Antimicrobials in Food Animal...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
The top two tweeted peer-reviewed science articles between 2010 and 2012 were about the effect of radiation on humans, according to a study ...