Some have argued that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) would erode employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) by providing incentives for employers to stop offering coverage. Others have claimed that most businesses would face increased costs as a result of reform, or even that the uncertainties surrounding the impact of health reform are hampering the economic recovery. A new study, however, finds that the effects on employer coverage and employer health care spending would actually be small.
The paper, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and prepared by Urban Institute researchers using their Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model, estimates how the ACA would affect ESI and employer costs. To investigate the effects of health reform on ESI, they simulate the ACA as if fully implemented in 2010 and contrast the results with the pre-reform baseline estimates for the year.
Among the researchers’ findings:
- Overall ESI coverage under the ACA would not differ significantly from what coverage would be without reform.
- Total employer spending on premium contributions, assessments and vouchers would be 0.6 percent lower under the ACA than without reform. Total spending by small firms would be 8.7 percent lower, mainly due to cost savings from the new exchanges. Spending by medium-sized firms would increase by 11.8 percent, because some would offer new coverage and others would be required to pay assessments. Large firms’ spending would be largely unaffected.
- The average employer contribution per person covered by ESI would decrease by 7.9 percent for small firms, 1.1 percent for medium-sized firms and 3.1 percent for large firms.
- In the absence of health reform, ESI coverage would fall by 2.6 percentage points in five years, assuming 5 percent annual growth in private premiums, and by 7.6 percentage points with 8 percent annual growth in premiums. Provisions of the ACA could moderate this long-term trend.
The brief’s finding that the ACA will have little overall effect on ESI coverage is similar to the findings of the Congressional Budget Office and runs counter to some predictions of a major decline in ESI because of the ACA.
Urban Institute Real Time Policy Analysis
These reports, also called "quick strikes," are a series of timely briefings examining a wide variety health insurance coverage issues in the United States.Learn more about the series
- About this grant
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
Hear from social scientist BJ Fogg, RWJF’s Entrepreneur-in-Residence Thomas Goetz, a team with a vision for creating a social epidemic of sa...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
NewPublicHealth spoke with Danny McGoldrick, vice president of research at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, about “A Broken Promise to Ou...
Imagine a shared national culture of health in which being healthy and staying healthy are esteemed social values.
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
2013 America’s Health Rankings Finds Significant Progress in National Health - FDA to Phase Out Use of Certain Antimicrobials in Food Animal...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
This fall, RWJF held its first ever Pitch Day event with the goal of discovering visionary ideas from a variety of thinkers.
NewPublicHealth spoke with John Auerbach, professor at Northeastern University and the primary author of a report on the Trust, and Cheryl B...