Field of Work: Evaluating state expansion of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Problem Synopsis: Before 2006, children of families with incomes above 200 percent of the federal poverty level were not eligible for CHIP. The high cost of private health insurance meant that children in these families often went uninsured.
Synopsis of the Work: Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Washington were among the first states to expand CHIP to children of families who exceeded that income guideline. From 2008 through 2010, researchers at the University of California-Los Angeles and the RAND Corp. evaluated the impact of these eligibility expansions on the coverage and affordability of health insurance for children and families.
The researchers specifically evaluated how states determined how much families had to pay for CHIP coverage, and the percentage of their incomes these payments represented.
Key Findings: Findings were published in an article and issue brief:
- Although affordability was a key factor in states' decisions regarding premiums for CHIP, officials also considered historical precedent, fiscal viability, premiums paid by public-sector employees, and simplicity. Officials also tried to avoid "crowd-out" of private insurance coverage.
- The percentage of their incomes families paid for CHIP coverage under the expanded programs varied substantially across the three states.
- For families earning less than 400 percent of the federal poverty level, family coverage through an exchange—created under the federal Affordable Care Act—is likely to be more affordable than a combination of CHIP and private insurance.
- Evidence that the states' efforts reduced the number of uninsured children was somewhat ambiguous.
State Health Access Reform Evaluation Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, State Health Access Reform EvaluationRead the Program Results for State Health Access Reform Evaluation
- About this grant
Outbreaks: Protecting Americans from Infectious Diseases, 2013, the new report from TFAH and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, lays out a ...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
A look back through history reveals outbreaks so expansive—so deadly—that they essentially changed the course of history. Here are the five ...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Outbreaks: Protecting Americans from Infectious Diseases assesses gaps in our health system that could severely limit our ability to effecti...
Abigail Saguy, author of What's Wrong with Fat?, talks about how obesity came to be understood as a public health crisis.
Outbreaks can advance quickly and through a wide variety of vectors. We have compiled a list of the top five strangest things that can sprea...
The RWJF “Voices of Quality” video contest collected stories about how hospitals, clinics and others are using data that measure how health ...
We've declared this week "Outbreak Week" and we're using it as an opportunity to crystallize discussion among the public health community an...
Among top concerns for the country’s future physicians are uncertainty about health care reform, practice choices, and debt repayment, accor...
Hear from social scientist BJ Fogg, RWJF’s Entrepreneur-in-Residence Thomas Goetz, a team with a vision for creating a social epidemic of sa...
Outbreaks can spread faster than you think. But luckily the development of new digital tools and technologies to assist with documenting, tr...