Blog Post
Sorting Out the Meaning of Hospital Pricing Disparities
What does U.S. health care have in common with an exotic international bazaar? The prices at either one are almost never posted, whether for...
Read more
The U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) ruled that Medicaid expansion move forward as an option for states. While ACA’s reforms were designed to move the U.S. toward universal coverage, the option for states to forgo Medicaid expansion may have unintended consequences regarding uncompensated care.
This article addresses the issue of payment reductions under the Medicare and Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) programs. Using coverage and income data from the American Community Survey with state data on Medicaid DSH allotments and Medicare cost reports, this article analyzed two scenarios: (1) total DSH reduction if a state fully expands Medicaid; and (2) DSH changes if the state forgoes expansion.
Understanding the fiscal implications is important for states to consider as they make decisions for its citizens and health care providers.