You are now viewing 1 - 10 of 49 results
August 1, 2012 | Evaluation
This evaluation assesses whether the Meta-Leadership Summits better prepared business, government, and nonprofit leaders to work effectively together during a public health or safety crisis.
April 1, 2009 | Evaluation/Report
This brief summarizes the overarching findings from 10 case study reports in Covering Kids and Families TM states.
February 1, 2007 | Issue Brief/Evaluation
This brief reviews evaluation findings about best practices in this area. For policy-makers considering SCHIP reauthorization, this brief provides information about the potential value of outreach and other types of program support.
January 1, 2011 | Evaluation
Mathematica interviewed key policy-makers in the 12 Consumer Voices for Coverage states in mid-2010 to assess changes in the involvement, influence and effectiveness of consumer advocacy groups in shaping state health coverage policy over the period of the CVC grant program (2008 to 2010).
January 1, 2008 | Evaluation/Report
This report assesses the impact of the Covering Kids & Families (CKF) program in Illinois from 1999 through 2005.
August 1, 2007 | Evaluation/Report
This report assesses the effectiveness of the Covering Kids & Families (CKF) program in Missouri from 1999 through 2005.
August 1, 2007 | Evaluation/Report
This report examines trends in Medicaid and SCHIP enrollment in Oregon between 1999 and 2004, during which time Covering Kids & Families (TM) was in operation.
August 1, 2010 | Evaluation
This report describes the progress made by Consumer Voices for Coverage participants during the first two years of the initiative.
June 1, 2010 | Evaluation
The evaluation of Covering Kids & Families� (CKF) found that broad-based cooperation on policy and procedural change?among advocacy groups, providers, state Medicaid and CHIP officials and other stakeholders? can be achieved and that such cooperation can be fundamental to increasing insurance coverage among children.
October 1, 2009 | Evaluation
This paper provides new findings on how low-income parents perceive the quality and affordability of care available to the uninsured.